A civil appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The appellant failed to appear on two hearing dates, prompting the court to dismiss the suit under Section 96 CPC. Connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
A.S.No.338 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013
P.N.Rayappan ... Appellant
Versus
1.Marammal
2.Palaniammal
3.P.N.Palanisamy 4.P.N.Manickam ... Respondents
Prayer:Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.719 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, dated 26.04.2013.
For Appellant : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This Appeal Suit has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, made in O.S.No.719 of 2010 dated 26.04.2013.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.03.2022, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Therefore, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
gbi To
A.S.No.338 of 2013
ssv[co] srg 31/03/2022
P.N.Rayappan
1.Marammal
2.Palaniammal
3.P.N.Palanisamy
4.P.N.Manickam
S.Kannammal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
