R.Sreedher v. Shanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The court dismissed the petition following the respondent's submission that the IWDP scheme had already been implemented.
What the court decided
WP.No.5546 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.No.5546 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013
Ponparappipatti Watershed Association, Rep by its President M.Chokalingam, (Registration No.187/2010), Ponparappipatty, Vennanthur Union, Rasipuram Taluk Namakkal District.
... Petitioner
.. Vs ..
- The National Wasteland Development Board, Rep by its Secretary, No.107, NGO Building Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi-110 011.
- The Commissioner/Director, Rural Development, Fort St. George Chennai-9
- The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Namakkal, Namakkal District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ponparappipatti Watershed Association, Rep by its President M.Chokalingam
- respondent
The National Wasteland Development Board
- respondent
The Commissioner/Director, Rural Development
- respondent
The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency
- respondent
Project Implementation Agency/Joint Director, Agricultural Department
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court