V.Govindan v. v.Shanmugham
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal challenged the dismissal of a partition suit. The High Court upheld the Trial Court's finding that a prior oral partition occurred and properties were self-acquired, holding the appellant not entitled to relief.
What did the court decide?
No. The Appeal Suit is dismissed.
What the court decided
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether there was a partition in the family consisting of the appellant and respondents in respect of the first item of the suit properties about 40 years back?
Whether the other items of the suit properties were purchased by the 1st Defendant in his name and are his self-acquired properties?
Whether the appellant is entitled to any partition of the suit properties?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Govindan
- respondent
V.shanmugham
- respondent
V.kesavan
- respondent
M.kumar
- respondent
The Sub Registrar, Bargur Krishnagiri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court