The High Court allowed the lender's application to raise the prohibitory order dated 12.03.2018 which attached the salary of the borrower, noting that an amicable settlement had been arrived at.
Application allowed by raising the prohibitory order dated 12.03.2018 in A.No.5189 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arb.Appln.No.174 of 2022
Arb.Appln.No.174 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The lender / financial institution has presented this application seeking
to raise the prohibitory order dated 12.03.2018 in A.No.5189 of 2016.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
1/2
Arb.Appln.No.174 of 2022
rna
13.09.2022
rna
Arb.Appln.No.174 of 2022
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to raise the prohibitory order dated 12.03.2018 attaching the salary of the second respondent.
Whether notice to respondents is necessary when the application is by the lender at whose instance the order was issued.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Applicant (Lender)
Respondents 1 and 2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
