of 2022 in O.A.No.86 of 2022 & Arb.…
Registry directed to refund court fee via cheque or DD in favour of Ms. Anu Ganesan as learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arb. Appln.No.166 of 2022 in O.A.No.86 of 2022 & Arb. Appln.No.167 of 2022 in Arb. Appln. No.68 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.
By order dated 25.04.2022, this Court directed to refund of court fee paid in Arb. Appln. No.68 of 2022 and O.A.No.86 of 2022 to the applicant. By the present applications, the applicant seeks a direction for refund by way of an instrument drawn in the name of Ms.Anu Ganesan, learned counsel. In paragraph 5 of the affidavit, the applicant has set out reasons for seeking refund in the name of the learned counsel.
08.09.2022
kal
1 / 2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
kal
Arb. Appln.No.166 of 2022 in O.A.No.86 of 2022 & Arb. Appln.No.167 of 2022 in Arb. Appln. No.68 of 2022
08.09.2022
2 / 2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
