T.Zahir Hussian v. Farid Bazil
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil application seeking security and property attachment was dismissed on the day of hearing as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the applicant via endorsement.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2022
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
A.No.631 of 2022 in C.S. No.39 of 2022
T.Zahir Hussain S/o. Thasil No.2, Gulam Murthuza Street, Wallajah Road, Chennai – 600 002. ... Applicant / Plaintiff
-Versus-
Farid Bazil S/o.T.Zahir Hussain New No. 10, Old No. 13, Subramaniam Street, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... Respondent / Defendant
Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an
order for directing the respondent to furnish secrity for suit claim for Rs.1,05,69,500/- failing which to pass an order of attachment of property located at No.17/10, Subramania Chetty Street, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005, pending disposal of the suit.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
T.Zahir Hussain
- respondent
Farid Bazil
Coram
P. VELMURUGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court