Allowed

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu v. Mr.Karunakaran and another

Madras HC4 Feb 2022A/52/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed applications filed by the Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu seeking eviction of tenants occupying a shop in Chennai. The respondents were directed to hand over vacant possession within one week, with the option of police assistance for default, and were ordered to pay rental arrears and damages.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to quit and deliver vacant possession of premises within one week. Permitted applicant to take possession with police assistance in default. Directed respondents to pay rental arr

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Vs Mr.Karunakaran and another — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶6

A.Nos.52 to 55 of 2021 in O.P.No.109 of 1942

¶7

O.P.No.109 of 1942:

¶8

In the matter of Will of Rao Bahadur V.Thiruvengadathan Chetty and In the matter of Uppathoor Thiruvengadathan Chetty Charities and Trust

¶9

The Administrator General of Madras ..Petitioner

¶10

A.Nos.52 to 55 of 2021:

¶11

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Madras High Court Campus Chennai- 600 104 ..Applicant (in all applications) vs 1.Mr.Karunakaran No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001 2.Mr.Ibrahim, No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001 ..Respondents (in all applications)

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

¶14

A.No.52 of 2021:

¶15

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the

¶16

respondents to quit and deliver the vacant possession of premises in the ground floor of No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai-1, within a time frame;

¶17

A.No.53 of 2021:

¶18

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an order that if the respondent fails to handover the vacant possession within the time framed by this Hon'ble Court, the applicant be permitted to take over the vacant possession through police force.

¶19

A.No.54 of 2021:

¶20

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the first respondent to pay the rental arrears upto 24.11.2019 aggregating a sum of Rs.35,880/- with applicable administrative charges as charged for delayed payment, applicable to all the tenants together with bank interest at the rate of 6% per annum;

¶21

A.No.55 of 2021:

¶22

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the damages for the premises occupied by them from 25.11.2019 to till the date of delivery of vacant possession at the rate of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.15,000/- per month.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

These applications coming on this day before this Court for hearing in

¶26

the presence of Mr.S.Raju, Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamiil Nadu , the applicant in all applications appearing in person and the respondents in all applications not appearing in person or by advocate and upon reading the judges summons and the report of the Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu filed in all applications,

¶27

It is ordered as follows :-

¶28

That the respondents in A.No.52 of 2021, be and are hereby directed to quit and deliver the vacant possession of the property morefully setout in the schedule hereunder, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

That in default of handing over the possession as mentioned in clause (1) supra, the learned Administrator General and Official Trustee, shall be at liberty to take possession of the said property with the assistance of the police.

¶30

3.That the first respondent in A.No.54 of 2021 be and is hereby directed to pay the rental arrears upto 24.11.2019 aggregating a sum of Rs.35,880/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty only) with applicable administrative charges as charged for delay payment,

¶31

applicable to all the tenants together with bank interest at the rate of 6% per https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

annum.

¶33

¶34

That the respondents in A.No.55 of 2021 be and are hereby

¶35

directed to pay the damages for the premises occupied by them from 25.11.2019 to till the date of delivery of vacant possession of the said property at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month.

¶36

SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY

¶37

Premises of a Shop bearing Door No.47, Moore Street, Chennai- 600 001 in Ground Floor having extent of 230 sq.ft., bounded on the

¶38

North by : No.48, Moore Street South by : Door No.46, Moore Street, East by : Moore Street West by : Private Building

¶39

WITNESS THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT AT MADRAS AFORESAID, THIS THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022.

¶40

Sd./-

¶41

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (O.S.II) //Certified to be true copy//

¶42

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶43

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶44

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

08.04.2022

A.Nos.52 to 55 of 2021 in O.P.No.109 of 1942

¶50

ORDER

¶51

DATED : 04.02.2022

¶52

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISAMY

¶53

FOR APPROVAL: 13.04.2022

¶54

APPROVED ON : 19.04.2022

¶55

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶56

¶57

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶58

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶59

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

¶60

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶61

A.Nos.52 to 55 of 2021 in O.P.No.109 of 1942

¶62

O.P.No.109 of 1942:

¶63

In the matter of Will of Rao Bahadur V.Thiruvengadathan Chetty and In the matter of Uppathoor Thiruvengadathan Chetty Charities and Trust The Administrator General of Madras ..Petitioner

¶64

A.Nos.52 to 55 of 2021: Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Madras High Court Campus Chennai- 600 104 ..Applicant (in all applications) vs 1.Mr.Karunakaran No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001

¶65

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶66

¶67

2.Mr.Ibrahim,

¶68

No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001

¶69

..Respondents (in all applications)

¶70

A.No.52 of 2021:

¶71

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the

¶72

respondents to quit and deliver the vacant possession of premises in the ground floor of No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai-1, within a time frame;

¶73

A.No.53 of 2021:

¶74

¶75

over the vacant possession through police force.

¶76

A.No.54 of 2021:

¶77

¶78

delayed payment, applicable to all the tenants together with bank interest at

¶79

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶80

the rate of 6% per annum;

¶81

¶82

A.No.55 of 2021:

¶83

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the

¶84

respondents to pay the damages for the premises occupied by them from 25.11.2019 to till the date of delivery of vacant possession at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month.

¶85

These applications coming on this day before this Court for hearing, The Court made the following order:

¶86

Pursuant to the order dated 26.02.2021, the learned Administrator General and Official Trustee has effected paper publication and also filed the proof for the same.

¶87

Though the names of the respondents have been printed in the cause list, none appeared for them.

¶88

The learned Administrator General and Official Trustee has filed the above applications for the following reliefs:

¶89

(i) Application No.52 of 2021- To direct the respondent to quit

¶90

and deliver vacant possession of the premises in the Ground Floor of No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai, within a time frame;

¶91

(ii)Application No.53 of 2021 - In the event of the respondents

¶92

failing to handover the vacant possession within the time fixed by this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court, the learned Administrator General and Official Trustee may be

¶93

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶94

¶95

permitted to take over the vacant possession through police force;

¶96

(iii) Application No.54 of 2021 - To pay the rental arrears

¶97

aggregating a sum of Rs.35,880/- upto 24.11.2019 together with bank interest at the rate of 6% per annum; and

¶98

(iv) Application No.55 of 2021 - To direct the respondents to pay the damages for the use and occupation of the premises from 25.11.2019 to till the date of delivery of vacant possession at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month.

¶99

The learned Administrator General and Official Trustee has filed the report, wherein it has been stated as follows:-

¶100

“ The Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu submits that the property bearing Door No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai 600 001 belongs to the Trust Estate of V.Thiruvenkadathan Chetty. The Trust is being administered by the Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu as per the Will of the founder of the trust.

¶101

2. The Official Trustee further submits that initially, the subject property was leased out to Mr.E.V.K. Selvaraj on a monthly rent. He violated the lease conditions and the first respondent was found as unauthorized possession in the said property. The Official Trustee had taken out eviction proceedings in A.Nos. 2965 to 2967 of 2008 against the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent and Mr.E.V.K. Selvaraj.

¶102

¶103

3. The Official Trustee further submits that the above said application was ordered and possession was handed over to the applicant on 27.07.2009. Thereafter, the first respondent had filed an Application No. 2192 of 2009 with a prayer to lease out the property with him. That application was ordered on 21.08.2009 [D1] in favour of the first respondent and the Hon’ble High Court directed him to execute a lease agreement and the subject property was leased out to him on15.09.2009.

¶104

4. The Official Trustee further submits that the Hon’ble High Court has fixed the monthly rent at Rs.1,750/-. The first respondent started to pay the rent and continued the tenancy. He was chronic defaulter to pay the rent. Lastly, the rent was enhanced to Rs.3,300/- w.e.f. 01.08.2018. Even during that time, the first respondent did not come forwarded to execute the lease agreement. It is a pathetic to record that neither the applicant nor the first respondent bothered about the Hon’ble High Court orders for execution of lease agreement.

¶105

5. The Official Trustee further submits that after the present AG & OT assumed the charge steps were taken to revise the rent. In substantial cases rent has been revised and new agreements were executed for other tenants. When the first respondent was called for revision of rent, he evaded to appear and finally, he appeared during March, 2020. When the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ revision of rent talk was started, he suggested that he would pay Rs.4,600/- w.e.f. 01.04.2020 and after getting further

¶106

¶107

consultation from his wife, he will finalize the same and execute lease agreement and took some time for appearance. As assured by him, he has not appeared and therefore, the revision of rent was not finalized and no agreement was executed.

¶108

6. The Official Trustee further submits that during the first week of October, 2020 when the Official Trustee himself inspected the property, the shop was opened and someone was found in the shop. On enquiry there was no proper answer from him. Then the first respondent was directed to appear before the applicant for enquiry. But the first respondent has been evading to appear so far.

¶109

7. The Official Trustee further submits that having doubt about first respondent’s possession of leased property, the estate staff was directed to inspect the subject property and report. The staff inspected on 22.10.2020 and appraised the issue on the same day and then next day filed a report dated 23.10.2020 [D2]. The inspection revealed one Mr.Ibrahim, the second respondent, was found in the premises. On direction he appeared before the applicant on 22.10.2020 evening. On enquiry it reveals from him that the first respondent had subletted the shop for few years back and collected huge rent. Both the respondents have partitioned the shop and doing their photocopier business. The front portion is occupied by second https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent and the rear portion is occupied by the first respondent. The first respondent has violated the Hon’ble

¶110

¶111

High Court order and other lease terms and conditions.

¶112

8. The Official Trustee further submits that on repeated calls from the applicant regarding the subject property, the first respondent has evading to attend the call. Since, the first respondent has violated the lease terms and conditions, the applicant had issued a show cause notice dated 28.10.2020 [D3] to the first respondent why the lease should not be terminated and take out the possession from him after a week time. But the notice was returned as “Unclaimed” [D4] . In the meantime, the first respondent had sent a letter dated 09.11.2020 [D5] requesting for extension of time to pay the rental arrears and disputing about the subletting.

¶113

9. The Official Trustee further submits that considering all these aspects, since the first respondent has violated the Hon’ble High Court order by sub-letting, the applicant by proceeding dated 24.11.2020 [D6] terminated the lease in favour of first respondent with immediate effect with direction to hand over the vacant possession immediately, failing which an action will be initiated to take the vacant possession and liable to pay damages Rs.15,000/- per month w.e.f. that notice date.

¶114

10. The Official Trustee further submits that as stated above, the first respondent has chronic defaulter to pay https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the rent and then and there he paid some amount. As per the rent register upto March, 2020 rent was paid at the rate of

¶115

¶116

Rs.2,300/- per month. Since, April, 2020 upto 24.11.2020, as per first respondent suggestion rent of Rs.4,600/- per month, the total arrears comes to Rs.35,880/-. Thereafter, the respondent liable to pay Rs.15,000/- per month as damages.

¶117

11. The Official Trustee further states that the above mentioned notice was delivered to the first respondent on 07.12.2020 as confirmed via Post office track consignment [D7]. But the first respondent not yet turned up. Hence, this application filed for eviction, claiming arrears of rent and damages.

¶118

In view of the above, the Official Trustee is, therefore, humbly submits and prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:-

¶119

(i) Direct the respondents to quit and deliver the vacant possession of premises in the ground floor of No.47, Moore Street, George Town, Chennai-1, within a time frame;

¶120

(ii) Direct the first respondent to pay the rental arrears upto 24.11.2019 aggregating a sum of Rs.35,880/- with applicable administrative charges as charged for delayed payment applicable to all the tenants together with bank interest at the rate of 6% per annum ;

¶121

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (iii) Direct the respondents to pay the damages for

¶122

the premises occupied by them from 25.11.2019 to

¶123

¶124

till the date of delivery of vacant possession at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per month;

¶125

(iv) If the respondents fail to handover the vacant possession within the time framed by this Hon’ble Court, the applicant may be permitted to take over the vacant possession through police force.

¶126

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu

¶127

SCHEDULE

¶128

Premises of a Shop bearing Door No.47, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001, in Ground Floor having extent of 230 Sq .Ft , bounded on the

¶129

North by : No.48, Moore Street

¶130

South by : Door No.46, Moore Street East by : Moore Street

¶131

West by : Private Building”

¶132

Being satisfied with the report filed by the learned

¶133

Administrator General and Official Trustee, I am of the considered view that the applications are liable to be allowed. The respondents are directed to handover vacant possession of the premises within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and in the event of the respondents

¶134

not handing over the possession, within the said time, the learned

¶135

Administrator General and Official Trustee is at liberty to take possession of

¶136

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶137

the property with the assistance of the police.

¶138

¶139

With the above observations, the applications are allowed.

¶140

Sd/-M.D.J. 04.02.2022

¶141

//Certified to be true copy//

¶142

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶143

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶144

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶145

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu v. Mr.Karunakaran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu v. Mr.Karunakaran and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Jain Mission Society Vs The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamilnadu

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Vs Nil

Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Vs Nil

S.Nagoor Kani Vs The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Madras

The Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Vs Tmt. S.Bharathi and another

The Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Vs Tmt. S.Bharathi and another