This order allows an application by the third defendant to condone a 40-day delay in filing a written statement due to sufficient cause. The court also lists the matter for future proceedings.
Application to condone 40-day delay in filing written statement allowed; Registry directed to receive writ; matter listed for 11.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.4707 of 2022
A.No.4707 of 2022 in C.S.No.56 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The third defendant has filed this application to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the written statement. On instructions, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has no objection to this application being allowed.
the written statement. There is no representation for the fourth defendant.
23.12.2022 (1/2)
1/3
A.No.4707 of 2022
rna
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
A.No.4707 of 2022 in C.S.No.56 of 2022
23.12.2022
2/3
A.No.4707 of 2022
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 40 days in filing the written statement by the third defendant can be condoned.
Third Defendant
Plaintiff
Second Defendant
Fourth Defendant
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
