Application for leave to sue under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent was allowed. Registry was directed to number the plaintiff's plaint to decide issues in one forum and avoid inconsistency across suits.
Leave to sue granted; registry directed to number the plaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.No.4672 of 2022 in C.S.DR.No.107737 of 2022
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
The plaintiff appears to have some issues with both the candidature and the election of the 2nd and 11th defendants in an election, which had been conducted and recognized by a circular dated 03.10.2021. The other defendants are outside the jurisdiction of this Court. In view of that particular fact, Clause 12 of the Letters Patent is pressed into service seeking leave to sue.
2.In the affidavit, it had been stated that there is also another civil suit pending in jurisdiction of this Court and also an original suit in Chennai. It would only be appropriate that the issues relating to the parties are decided in one forum, to avoid inconsistency in orders to be passed.
3.Viewed from that particular angle, leave is granted and this application is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the plaint, if it is otherwise in order.
19.10.2022
smv
2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Smv
A.No.4672 of 2022 in C.S.DR.No.107737 of 2022
19.10.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to sue should be granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent as other defendants are outside this Court's jurisdiction.
PLAINTIFF
2nd AND 11th DEFENDANTS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
