M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs Travelone India Pvt. Ltd, Rep. by its Director

¶1

A.No.4631 of 2022

¶2

Application No.4631 of 2022 and Arb.O.P.(Com.Div)No.294 of 2021

¶3

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.

¶4

By the previous order on 11.10.2022, it was recorded that the

¶5

parties have concluded a settlement. The said settlement was for a consolidated sum of Rs.11.25 lakhs. After reckoning payments made previously, a further sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was to be paid and the said sum is in court deposit. Therefore, the applicant herein was directed to file an application for payment out of the sum.

¶6

The applicant has filed the present application for this purpose

¶7

and the certificate of funds is enclosed. The certificate of funds discloses that a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- is lying in court deposit to the credit of Arb O.P.(Com.Div)No.294 of 2021. Learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondents herein, who were the petitioners in the Arb O.P., states that the said respondents have no objection to this application being allowed. The third and fourth respondents herein were given up in the Arb O.P.

¶8

In the above facts and circumstances, this application is liable to

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _______________

¶10

Page No.1 of 3

¶11

A.No.4631 of 2022

¶12

be allowed. Accordingly, this application is allowed. The Registry is directed

¶13

to permit the applicant to withdraw the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only), which was deposited to the credit of Arb O.P.(Com.Div)No.294 of 2021. Consequently, Arb.O.P.(Com.Div)No.294 of 2021 is closed.

18.10.2022

rrg

SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.2 of 3_

¶19

A.No.4631 of 2022

¶20

rrg

¶21

Application No.4631 of 2022

¶22

18.10.2022

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.3 of 3_

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Travelone India Pvt. Ltd, Rep. by its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Travelone India Pvt. Ltd, Rep. by its Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Eagle Earth Movers Vs The General Manager

Official Liquidator Vs Nill

Mrs.Kanta Ben, W/o. Mr.Vishan Kumar Vs The Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras

Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd, Rep. by its General Manager Vs Vedang Soft Pvt. Ltd, Rep by its Director and CEO Sudhir Bahuguna

Mr.Kirankumar Moolchand Jain S/o. Moolchand Vs TransUnion Cibil Ltd.Formerly Credit Information Bureau India Ltd.

Mr.S.Dhanaraj, S/o.Selvaraj Vs The Official Liquidator,High Court of Madras