K.v.Sukumar v. Ambika Appalam Company, and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
4619, 4620, 4621, 4622 & 4624 of 2021…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.4618, 4619, 4620, 4621, 4622 & 4624 of 2021, O.A.Nos.765, 766 & 767 of 2021 in C.S.(Comm.Div)No.105 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
Since both parties intend to
proceed with the suit instead of contesting the pending interlocutory applications, all applications are closed.
- The plaintiff states that
the written statement in respect of the counter claim was filed along with an application to condone delay in the filing thereof. An adjournment is requested to number and list the said application.
List on 20.04.2022.
12.04.2022
kal
Coram
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court