This order grants leave to the petitioner to file an application for partition and declaration under Clause 12 of the Original Side Rules, as part of the cause of action arose within the court's jurisdiction.
Leave granted to file the application; application allowed; registry directed to number the plaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.No.3903 of 2022 in CS.DR.No.112008 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Clause 12 of the Original Side Rules permits leave to be granted, if substantial or part of cause of action arises within jurisdiction of this Court.
2.Mr.P.B.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the suit had been filed for partition and for declaration that the sale deed registered in a Sub-Registrar office which is outside to the jurisdiction of this Court as null and void.
3.Since part of cause of action had arisen within the jurisdication of this Court, leave is granted and this application is allowed.
4.The Registry is directed to number the plaint, if it is otherwise
in order.
08.09.2022
smv
2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Smv
A.No.3903 of 2022 in
CS.DR.No.112008 of 2021
08.09.2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave should be granted for filing an application arising within the court's jurisdiction.
Whether the partition suit and declaration suit satisfy the jurisdictional requirement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
