Single judge allowed an application to reopen evidence in a civil suit after the close of evidence, noting no objection from respondents.
Application to reopen evidence and permit leading further evidence was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2961 of 2022 in C.S.No.581 of 2015
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.,
This application has been filed to reopen the evidence of the applicants / plaintiffs which was closed on 07.07.2022 and permit the applicants / plaintiffs to lead further evidence in the above Suit in C.S.No.581 of 2015.
2.Ms.P.R.Vandana, for M/s.Surana and Surana, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and Mr.Prashant Rajagopal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 have no serious objection in allowing this application.
3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Court is inclined to allow this application.
4.This application stands allowed accordingly.
26.07.2022
kas
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the evidence closed in the underlying suit should be reopened to permit leading further evidence.
Applicants / Plaintiffs
1st Respondent
Respondents 2 and 3
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
