B.Srinivasan v. Mrs.Kalavathy and 6 others
Madras HCA/2867/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in C.S.No.504 of 2018 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
A.No.2867 of 2022 in C.S.No.504 of 2018
¶2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
¶3
The application need not be listed again.
¶4
- It is stated that the written statement has been taken on record. The relief sought namely to condone delay in filing the written statement has now become otiose and need not be examined further since, a preliminary decree itself has been passed.
¶5
- Recording the same, the application stands closed.
¶6
04.11.2022 (1/4)
¶7
ssi
Coram
AI extract
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court