Raj Chordia v. The Research Foundation for Jainology
Case brief
What is this about?
in C.S.No.199 of 2020 A.No.2596 of 2021 in…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2596 of 2021 in C.S.No.199 of 2020
A.No.2596 of 2021 in C.S.No.199 of 2020
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
This application has been filed the by the plaintiffs to implead the proposed parties as defendants 21 to 36 in the above suit.
2 Heard both sides and perused the records.
3 This application has been opposed by the defendants that the applicants/plaintiffs bringing new cause of action by impleading the proposed parties and hence this application has to be dismissed.
4 It is seen that the proposed parties are subsequently elected office bearers of the first defendant society and if they are impleaded in the above suit as defendants, no prejudice would be caused to the defendants.
5 For the foregoing reasons and being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit, this application is allowed.
6 Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs is directed to file amended copy of the plaint.
22.03.2022
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court