An application under the Companies Act/contributory to trust affairs was filed by a Trustee to be impleaded as a party in a pending petition. The Single Judge held that while the validity of his appointment was not to be decided, the applicant was a proper and necessary party and ordered his impleadment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2323 of 2021 in A.No.815 of 2021 in O.P.No.175 of 2018
P.VELMURUGAN, J.,
This application has been filed to implead the applicant herein as a respondent in A.No.815 of 2021 in O.P.No.175 of 2018.
Page No.1/3
materials available on record.
Post the matter on 29.03.2022.
ms
08.03.2022
P.VELMURUGAN, J.,
Page No.2/3
ms
A.No.2323 of 2021 in A.No.815 of 2021 in O.P.No.175 of 2018
08.03.2022
Page No.3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is a proper and necessary party to implead as a respondent in the parent application.
Applicant
Respondent 3
Respondents 1 and 2
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
