Application for leave to file reply statement was allowed on consent. It is appropriate that pleadings be completed and parties given an opportunity to state all facts in the form of pleadings. Reply statement filed is taken on record.
Application allowed. Reply statement filed taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application No.2284 of 2021 in C.S.No.186 of 2019
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
This application has been filed seeking leave to accept a reply statement to the written statement already filed.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, it had been stated that the original plaintiff had passed away pending the suit and that, the deponent of the affidavit had come on record as the second plaintiff. The first defendant is the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff. Written statement had been filed. It is stated that subsequent events occurred which are relevant for the adjudication of the suit. Therefore, leave is sought. It is stated that a reply is required.
3.Heard the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent
also.
1
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
sms
4.It only be appropriate that pleadings are completed and parties,
who come to Court, are given an opportunity to state all facts in the form of pleadings. On that basis, this application is allowed. The reply statement filed is taken on record.
Sms
15.09.2022
(1/6)
Application No.2284 of 2021 in C.S.No.186 of 2019
2
Second Plaintiff
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
