The Single Judge dismissed the applicant's application to be impleaded as a defendant since Railways had already been impleaded. The judge also noted the date for filing the written statement.
Application to implead the petitioner as a defendant was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2109 of 2021 and O.A.No.132 of 2021 in C.S.No.80 of 2021
P.VELMURUGAN.,J
Respondents 1 to 3 have filed the suit in C.S.No.80 of 2021 for declaration, declaring the respondents 1 to 3 prescribed tile to the suit schedule property by way of adverse possession for the extent of 4200 sq.ft with land and building bearing old Door No.57-A and New Door No.72, Perambaur High Road, Chennai and for consequential injunction.
1/3
Side) appearing for the respondents 3,4,6 and 8 submitted that Railways has been impleaded as sixth defendant.
petitioner is neither a necessary party nor a proper party in this Suit, the application filed by the petitioner is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Application No.2109 of 2021 in C.S.No.80 of 2021 is dismissed.
2021 on 07.03.2022, for filing written statement. It is made clear that no further
adjournments will be granted.
07.02.2022
mfa
2/3
P.VELMURUGAN.,J
mfa
A.No.2109 of 2021 and O.A.No.132 of 2021 in C.S.No.80 of 2021
07.02.2022
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, who filed the suit as a plaintiff, is a necessary or proper party to be impleaded as a defendant in the same suit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
"Respondents 1 to 3"
P. VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
