Allowed
Mahindra World City Developers Limited v. Om Shakthy Agencies (Madras) Pvt. Ltd.
Madras HCA/1994/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
A.No.1994 of 2022 in C.S.No.193 of 2021…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1994 of 2022
A.No.1994 of 2022 in C.S.No.193 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
The applicant states that the 9th respondent filed a counter on 09.08.2021. From the said counter, it is stated that the applicant discovered that the Schedule - A property was mortgaged by the 9th respondent on 18.03.2009 under Document No.864 of 2009. Consequently, the applicant asserts that the first and fifth defendants have divested the 9th defendant of title through devious means. Consequently, it is stated that the amendments prayed for are necessary.
state that they do not propose to do so. The application has been filed at the pre-trial stage. On examining the affidavit in support of this application, it is evident that the amendments were necessitated by facts discovered by the application from the counter of the 9th respondent. Accordingly, A.No.1994 of 2022 is allowed as prayed for. As a consequence, the plaintiff is permitted to carry out the amendments specified in the schedule to the Judge's Summons on or before 28.06.2022. After carrying out the amendments, a copy of the amended plaint shall be served on the defendant within one week thereafter. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/2
A.No.1994 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
rna
14.06.2022
rna
A.No.1994 of 2022 in C.S.No.193 of 2021
2/2
The Applicant
SENTCHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court