Dismissed

Perumalraj.R v. the Authorized Officer

Madras HC14 Jun 2021WP(MD)/9310/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging a bank's sale certificate of mortgaged property, holding the challenge not maintainable as the proper remedy lies before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court denied the petition but granted liberty to approach the bank separately for relief regarding unlocking a sealed premise.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the respondent-bank separately for necessary relief regarding unlocking the sealed premises.

Perumalraj.R Vs the Authorized Officer — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.9310 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶5

W.P.(MD) No.9310 of 2021 and WMP(MD).Nos.7836, 7031 to 7033 of 2021

¶6

R.Perumal Raj .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, Regional Office, Plot No.40, 80 Feet Road, Aringar Anna Nagar, Madurai District.

¶9

The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Collectorate Branch, Dindigul District.

¶10

Mr.S.Sasikumar ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating the impugned sale certificate issued by the first respondent herein in RO/MDU/LAW/154/2019-20, dated 30.01.2020 and quash the same as illegal.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.B.Sundhareshwar For respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar for R1 and R2

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

___________ Page 1 of 3

¶15

W.P.(MD).No.9310 of 2021

¶16

ORDER

¶17

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶18

The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the sale certificate issued by the respondent-bank pursuant to the sale of the property, which has been mortgaged by the petitioner for the secured loan transaction.

¶19

Admittedly, till date, the petitioner has not challenged any of the measures taken by the respondent-bank under the SARFAESI Act for recovery of loan. As against the impugned sale certificate, the petitioner ought to have filed an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal and the writ petition is not maintainable. The petitioner has also expressed one more grievance that the property is the dwelling house and the property has been locked and sealed by the respondent-bank and he requests to unlock and unseal the premises; so that, the petitioner is able to take his belongings, which are alleged to be kept inside the house. It is not clear as to whether the properties are vacant properties or whether any movable articles are inside the premises.

¶20

Since we are of the view that challenge to the sale certificate is not maintainable, we cannot issue any positive direction in this writ petition. However, we give liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent-bank for necessary relief, which shall be considered in accordance of law.

¶21

With the above observation, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

¶22

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

Pkn

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned .

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

___________ Page 2 of 3

¶29

W.P.(MD).No.9310 of 2021

¶30

To: 1. The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, Regional Office, Plot No.40, 80 Feet Road, Aringar Anna Nagar, Madurai District. 2. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Collectorate Branch, Dindigul District. +1 CC to M/s.N.DILIPKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-19325[F] dated 15/06/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SUNDHARESHWAR.V.B., Advocate ( SR-19407[F] dated 16/06/2021 )

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.9310 of 2021

¶32

14.06.2021

¶33

CN(21.06.2021) 3P 5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

___________ Page 3 of 3

Perumalraj.R v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumalraj.R v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venkatesan.R Vs State of Tamilnadu

Gunasekaran Ponmani Vs the District Collector

Sundaravel.a.M Vs the Principal Secretary

The Management Vs K.K.Rajan

The State of Tamilnadu Vs the Correspondnet

Thavamuniyasamy.a Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer