Disposed

Sureshkumar.S v. the Deputy Registrar

Madras HC7 Jul 2021WP(MD)/8002/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to investigate illegalities committed by the second respondent, the President of a Primary Agriculture Credit Society. The court directed the first respondent to act on the complaint, afford an opportunity to the accused, and decide within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to act upon the petitioners representation against the second respondent and deal with the same within eight weeks.

Sureshkumar.S Vs the Deputy Registrar — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.8002 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.07.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.(MD).No.8002 of 2021

... Petitioner

S.Sureshkumar

Vs.

1.The Deputy Registrar,

¶10

O/o. The Deputy Registrar for Co-operative Societies, Madavar Complex,

¶11

Srivilliputhur,

¶12

Virudhunagar District.

¶13

2.Giri @ Jeyagiri ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to take appropriate action against the President of W.Pudhupatti SP.SPL.38, Primary Agriculture Credit Society, W.Pudhupatti, Watrayiruppu Taluk, Virudhunagar District, the 2^nd respondent herein, on the basis of the Petitioner's representation, dated 05.03.2021.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Vadivel

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai for R1 Government Advocate

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to act upon the representation made by the petitioner, on 05.03.2021, wherein, the petitioner is seeking for taking action against the second respondent, who is the President of the Society on the ground that he has committed various illegalities.

¶19

2.When the matter was taken up for admission, on 17.04.2021, this Court directed the learned Government Counsel to take instructions from the first respondent with regard to the progress on the representation given by the petitioner. Thereafter, it was again posted, on 17.06.2021. Once again, the matter is posted today. There seems to be no progress in the representation made by the petitioner and the same was reported by the learned Government Counsel.

¶20

3.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ case and the limited relief sought for in this writ petition,

¶21

1/2

¶22

W.P.(MD).No.8002 of 2021

¶23

there shall be a direction to the first respondent to act upon the representation / complaint made by the petitioner, on 05.03.2021 and deal with the same on its own merits and in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to the second respondent and take a decision, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

4.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2021

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

NOTE:

¶30

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.The Deputy Registrar,

¶33

O/o. The Deputy Registrar for Co-operative Societies, Madavar Complex, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.A.VADIVEL, Advocate ( SR-21633[F] dated 08/07/2021 )

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-21723[F] dated 08/07/2021 )

¶36

Order made in

¶37

W.P.(MD).No.8002 of 2021

¶38

07.07.2021

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

2/2

Sureshkumar.S v. the Deputy Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sureshkumar.S v. the Deputy Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayapaul D.S Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Gnanasekaran.K Vs the District Collector

Velusamy Vs the District Collector

Manikandan Vs the District Revenue Officer

Mr.a.Prakash, S/O.Arumugam Vs Inspector General of

S.C. Balakrishnan, Vs the Sub Registrar