Disposed

Sakthivel.K v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Jun 2021WP(MD)/7127/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed the plea for an immediate positive direction. Instead, it directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's pending representation on professional tax and police protection within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to consider the pending representation on professional tax and police protection and pass orders on merits within three weeks.

Sakthivel.K Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.[MD]No.7127 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.06.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI W.P.[MD]No.7127 of 2021

¶4

K.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs.

¶5

1.The District Collector Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District

¶6

2.The Superintendent of Police Pudukkottai District

¶7

3.The Commissioner Manalmelkudi Panchayat Union Pudukkottai District

¶8

4.The Inspector of Police Manalmelkudi Police Station Pudukkottai District ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the representation dated 05.01.2021 given by the petitioner to issue professional tax receipt and direct the 4^th respondent to give suitable police protection to the business place of petitioner's village people.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Durai Solaimalai For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran Standing Counsel for Government

¶11

ORDER

¶12

¶13

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

¶14

We have heard Mr.D.Durai Solaimalai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Standing Counsel for Government appearing for the respondents.

¶15

2.This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the 3^rd respondent to consider his representation and issue professional tax receipt and direct the fourth respondent to give police protection. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P.[MD]No.7127 of 2021

¶18

3.Such a positive direction cannot be granted in this case, especially when the respondents have not given any written instruction to the learned Standing Counsel for Government. The representation was given on 05.01.2021 and reminder was sent on 16.03.2021, even then, the said representation is pending. Therefore, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

4.With the above direction, this Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶20

Assistant Registrar (AE)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

ogy/msa

¶24

Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, : a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶25

To 1.The District Collector Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District

¶26

2.The Superintendent of Police Pudukkottai District

¶27

3.The Commissioner Manalmelkudi Panchayat Union Pudukkottai District

¶28

4.The Inspector of Police Manalmelkudi Police Station Pudukkottai District

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-19347[F] dated 15/06/2021 )

¶30

W.P.[MD]No.7127 of 2021 11.06.2021

¶31

KK(21.06.2021) 2P 6C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Sakthivel.K v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakthivel.K v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Tamilnadu, Vs a.Vellasamy

Sri Lakshmi Modern Rice Mill Vs the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Seenivasan.v.C Vs the Commissioner

Venkatesan.R Vs State of Tamilnadu

Gunasekaran Ponmani Vs the District Collector

Sundaravel.a.M Vs the Principal Secretary