Disposed

Veera Sathaiah.v v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC2 Feb 2021WP(MD)/585/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed to direct the respondents to survey the petitioner's land. The Special Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner paid only the measuring fee but not the survey fee. The court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to pay the complete charge within one week, after which the 1st respondent must measure

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay survey fee within one week; 1st respondent directed to survey land within three weeks of receipt of payment.

Veera Sathaiah.v Vs the Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.585 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.(MD) No.585 of 2021

V.Veera Sathaiah

... Petitioner

1.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶7

2.The Head Surveyor, Devakottai Taluk Office, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai.

¶8

... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to survey the land situated in S.No.384/1A at Melachembanmari Village Group, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District, by considering the petitioner's application and payment of chellan dated 08.10.2018.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Special Government Pleader

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents to survey the land situated in S.No.384/1A at Melachembanmari Village Group, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District, by considering the petitioner's application and payment of chellan dated 08.10.2018.

¶13

2.Notice was ordered by this Court on 19.01.2021 and in response to the same, Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Special Government Pleader entered appearance on behalf of the respondents.

¶14

3.The learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner has paid only Rs.80/- towards measuring and surveying of the land instead of stipulated fee. He would therefore submit that if the petitioner pays the stipulated fee, the claim of the petitioner would be considered within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶15

4.In consideration of the pleadings of the learned Special Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

W.P.(MD)No.585 of 2021

¶19

i) The petitioner is directed to make appropriate payment / charge towards measuring and surveying of the subject land within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

ii) The 1^st respondent is directed to measure and survey the subject land within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the appropriate payment / charge.

5.No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

mm To

¶27

1.The Tahsildar,Devakottai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 2.The Head Surveyor, Devakottai Taluk Office, Devakottai Taluk,Sivagangai. +1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-3081[F] dated 03/02/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-3150[F] dated 03/02/2021 )

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.585 of 2021 02.02.2021

¶29

(MJ)CO AP(15/02/2021) 2 P 5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Veera Sathaiah.v v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veera Sathaiah.v v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthulingam.M Vs The District Registrar

Vishnuprabha Vs The State of TamilNadu

Najmudeen Mubarak Vs the Dist.Collector

Sri.Jeganathan. K Vs The District Collector

Palaniappan. Rm Vs The Divisional Engineer

Ayyakkannu Vs the District Collector