Disposed

Veeranasamy @ Veeranan.a v. the Dist. Collector

Madras HC26 Apr 2021WP(MD)/3683/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition sought a mandamus to shift a paddy procurement centre from the third respondent's private land to a government place. The court, noting paddy procurement was complete, directed future centres be located in uncontroversial government/society land.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to ensure future paddy procurement centres are located on uncontroversial government or society land.

Veeranasamy @ Veeranan.a Vs the Dist. Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.3683 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.04.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.3683 of 2021

¶7

A.Veeranasamy @ Veeranan .. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶8

3.Rajendran, President, T.Velangudi Village Panchayat, Narikudi panchayat Union, Thiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to shift the temporary paddy Procurement Centre functioning in 3^rd respondent's private land in S.No.355/2D to an extent of 0.20.0 Hectares situated at T.Velangudi Village, Narikudi Panchayat Union, Thiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District to the Government based public place in 151-Pattamangalam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Pattamangalam Village, Thiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2021.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Anandan For Respondents : Mr.A.Karthik Government Advocate for R1 Mr.H.Arumugam for R2

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

___________ Page 1 of 3_

¶13

W.P.(MD)No.3683 of 2021

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶16

This Writ Petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, has been filed, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct respondents 1 and 2 to shift the temporary paddy Procurement Centre functioning in 3^rd respondent's private land in S.No.355/2D to an extent of 0.20.0 Hectares situated at T.Velangudi Village, Narikudi Panchayat Union, Thiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District to the Government based public place in 151-Pattamangalam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Pattamangalam Village, Thiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2021.

¶17

2.By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶18

3.Heard Mr.B.Anandan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.A.Karthick, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and Mr.H.Arumugam, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent. In view of the order, we propose to pass in the Writ Petition, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with.

¶19

4.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent, who is the President of T.Velangudi Village Panchayat is inimical towards the people who did not vote him. As a result, when the petitioner and others went to the temporary Paddy Procurement Centre located in his land, they were put to harassment. However, these controversies cannot be adjudicated in the Writ Petition.

¶20

5.Mr.H.Arumugam, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent on instructions submitted that for the current year, the paddy procurement is completed. Therefore, the prayer sought for has become infructuous.

¶21

6.In the light of the above, the second respondent Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation, while locating the temporary Paddy Procurement Centre, shall ensure that it will be located in an uncontroversial place, preferably the land owned by the Government or it's Board or Corporation or Society, so that nobody has any grievance. We are not casting any aspersions on the fifth respondent, but this observation is made so that the public can freely go to the temporary Paddy Procurement Centre along with the produce without being subjected to any embarrassment.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

___________ Page 2 of 3_

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.3683 of 2021

¶25

7.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction and observation. No costs.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar ()

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶29

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned .

¶31

To:

¶32

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶33

2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-17636[F] dated 27/04/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-17749[F] dated 27/04/2021 )

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.3683 of 2021 26.04.2021

¶36

RK(13.05.2021) 3P 5C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

___________ Page 3 of 3_

Veeranasamy @ Veeranan.a v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeranasamy @ Veeranan.a v. the Dist. Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar.a Vs the District Collector

R.Saminathan Vs the District Collector

Jeyasundaram Vs the District Collector

Kaliakkavilai Thinasari Santhai Vs the Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Auspin Jeba Raj.I Vs the Inspector General of Registrar

Ramasamy.K Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer(Rdo)