Dismissed

Palanikumar. v. Vs The District Collector

Madras HC28 Jun 2021WP(MD)/3176/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought directions to authorities to act against illegal construction and operation of an Ice Plant by two respondents without necessary permissions. The court directed officials to ensure no plant operates without permission and to consider applications under law.

What did the court decide?

The official respondents were directed to ensure no Ice Plant operates without proper permission and to consider permission applications in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of.

Palanikumar. v Vs The District Collector — Environment and Pollution | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.3176 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 28.06.2021

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.3176 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) No.2520 of 2021

¶6

V.Palanikumar

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Tharamani, Chennai.

¶9

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Pamban, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Ramanathapuram.

¶10

5.The Block Development Officer, Mandapam Panchayat Union, Uchipuli, Ramanathapuram District. 6.N.Senthil Rajan 7.S.Suganthi ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.01.2021, seeking to take action against the illegal construction of Ice Plant by the 6^th and 7^th respondent in Survey Nos.347/1B2E, 347/1B2d, 295/1C6B and 280/2C at Santhiyanagar, Bekkarumbu, Thangachimadam, Ramanathapuram without getting any permission from the authorities concerned and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/3

¶14

W.P.(MD)No.3176 of 2021

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr.A.K.Manickam

¶16

Standing Counsel for Government For Respondent No.4 : Mr.C.Kasirajan Standing Counsel For Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For Respondent No.5 : No appearance

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(Order of the Court was made by T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)

¶19

The petitioner seeks for a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 5 to take action against the illegal construction of Ice Plant by respondent Nos.6 and 7 in Survey Nos.347/1B2E, 347/1B2d, 295/1C6B and 280/2C at Santhiyanagar, Bekkarumbu, Thangachimadam, Ramanathapuram without getting any permission from the authorities concerned.

¶20

2.Learned counsel for respondent Nos.6 and 7 submitted that only construction is going on after obtaining building plan approval and no Ice Plant is in operation without obtaining permission/approval/consent order from the Pollution Control Board etc.,

¶21

3.The Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division, Karaikudi in her report to the Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre dated 27.01.2021, has stated that no permission has been granted to any of the four Ice Plants, including that of respondent Nos.6 & 7, to run the same.

¶22

4.In the light of the above, the official respondents are directed to see to it that no Ice Plant is in operation without obtaining proper permission and if any application is made seeking permission, the same should be considered in accordance with law.

¶23

5.The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS I)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/3

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.3176 of 2021

¶31

¶32

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Tharamani, Chennai. 3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Pamban, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Ramanathapuram. 5.The Block Development Officer, Mandapam Panchayat Union, Uchipuli, Ramanathapuram District.

¶35

+2 CC to M/s.S.DEENADHAYALAN, Advocate ( SR-20478[F] dated 29/06/2021 )

¶36

+1 CC to M/s.M.JERIN MATHEW, Advocate ( SR-20777[F] dated 30/06/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-20677[F] dated 30/06/2021 )

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.3176 of 2021 28.06.2021

¶38

AS(05.07.2021) 3P 10C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/3

Palanikumar. v. Vs The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palanikumar. v. Vs The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrasekaran.M Vs the Dist.Collector

Chamundi Bose Vs the Dist Collector

Pandidurai Vs the District Collector

Tvl.Kasilakshmi & Co., Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Manuvel Raj Vs the District Collector

B.Ravi Vs the Honble Member Secretary