The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court discharged the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for patta issuance, directing orders within six weeks after submission of relevant documents.
Direction to second respondent to pass orders on petitioner's representation within six weeks upon submission of relevant documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.3148 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :19.04.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P(MD) No.3148 of 2021
G.Duraimurugan ...Petitioner Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul Revenue, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Thasildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner for his house plot Nos.2A, 2part, 2part situated at Dindigul District, Chettinayakanpatti Village in S.No.292/4, based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.12.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.P.Mahendran Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 01.12.2020, where the petitioner is seeking for issuance of Patta in his name.
2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the second respondent has already taken cognizance of the representation made by the petitioner. The learned Additional Government Pleader further submitted that if the petitioner submits all the relevant documents before the second respondent, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed, within the time stipulated by this Court.
3.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also of the fact that the second respondent has already https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P(MD)No.3148 of 2021
acted upon the application submitted by the petitioner, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to pass orders strictly in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall make a fresh representation to the second respondent along with all the relevant documents and also a copy of this order.
4.This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.
// True Copy //
Note:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
+1 CC to M/s.S.SARVAGANPRABHU, Advocate ( SR-16618[F] dated 20/04/2021)
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-16952[F] dated 21/04/2021)
W.P(MD) No.3148 of 2021 Dated 19.04.2021
JA(05.05.2021) 2P 5C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second respondent is liable to be directed to issue patta and act upon the petitioner's representation.
Whether the second respondent had sufficiently acting upon the petitioner's representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Duraimurugan
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul Revenue, Dindigul District, Dindigul
The Thasildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District
N Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
