Dismissed

S.Suresh Babu v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC6 Dec 2021WP(MD)/22531/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two connected writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought to quash proceedings and direct the transport officer not to cancel or transfer a vehicle registration certificate. The court observed that the petitioner's learned counsel obtained leave to withdraw the petitions. Accordingly, all connected writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petitio

What the court decided

AI extract

S.Suresh Babu Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

WP(MD) No.22531 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 06.12.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P(MD)Nos. 22531 of 2019 and 4317 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos. 19312 of 2019 and 3634 of 2020

¶7

S. Suresh Babu ... Petitioner in both Wps.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai South, Madurai.

¶10

The Manager, Commercial Vehicle Collection, HDFC Bank Pvt Ltd., 34 Krishnarayar theppakulam Street, Madurai. ... Respondents in W.P(MD)No. 22531 of 2019

¶11

The Revenue Transport Officer, Madurai North, Madurai.

¶12

The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Pvt Ltd., 34 Krishnarayar theppakulam Street, Madurai. ... Respondents in W.P(MD)No. 4317 of 2020

¶13

PRAYER in W.P(MD)No. 22531 of 2019: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings pending in 34673/A2/2019 dated 19.09.2019 of first respondent and quash the same and pass orders.

¶14

PRAYER in W.P(MD)No. 4317 of 2020: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent not to cancel or transfer the 9909 based on the petitioner's representing dated 17.02.2020 and pass orders the Registration certificate in vehicle numbers, TN 59 BM 9099 and TN 59 BM 9909 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/3

¶16

WP(MD) No.22531 of 2019

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr. J. Senthilkumar

¶18

For Respondents : Mr. T. Amjad Khan, Government Advocate for R1 in both writ petitions

¶19

Mrs. A. Banumathy for R2 in both writ petitions

¶20

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶21

Mr. J. Senthilkumar, learned counsel on record for petitioner requests leave of this court to withdraw the captioned writ petitions. The learned counsel has made an endorsements in the case files, which read as follows:

¶22

'Kindly permit me to withdraw the case'

¶23

Learned counsel reiterated the aforementioned endorsements in the hearing.

¶24

In the light of the endorsements and reiteration of the same, captioned writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, captioned WMPs are also dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

Assistant Registrar (W)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

mnr

¶29

Note :

¶30

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai South, Madurai.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/3

¶35

WP(MD) No.22531 of 2019

¶36

06.12.2021

¶37

The Revenue Transport Officer, Madurai North, Madurai.

¶38

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-37593,37597[F] dated 07/12/2021 )

¶39

W.P(MD)Nos. 22531 of 2019 and 4317 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos. 19312 of 2019 and 3634 of 2020

¶40

RK(30/12/2021) 3P 4C

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶42

3/3

S.Suresh Babu v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

S.Suresh Babu v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Samuvel John, S/O.John Vs the Regional Transport Officer

M/S.Southern Trade Links Vs the Deputy Director

Jeya. S Vs the Additional Superintendent of Police

Sharpudeen Vs the Chief Executive Officer

Veeraragavan Vs the Superintendent

K.Muthukrishnan Vs the Assistant Commissioner