6.Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that writ petitioner is not assailing said G.O, but writ petitioner's case is that land ear-marked for development or land set apart by saying 'to be developed' comprised in paimash Nos.74 to 83A part is relatable to Survey Nos.258/4 whereas writ petitioner's land comprised in Survey Nos.74 to 83B in Vijayaraghava Mudaliyar Chattram Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District is relatable to Survey No.286/8, Patta No.320 and present T.S.No.90. In this regard, it is submitted that paimash Nos.74 to 83B originally admeasured about 3 acres belonged to one Somu Ammal, W/o.Kannappa Pillai, who had purchased the same under sale deed dated 20.09.1935, it was sold to her daughter Villayammal, that said Somu Ammal died in the year 1940 and after demise of Valliyammal on 10.04.2003, it devolved upon writ petitioner (Valliyammal's daughter). To be noted, in said G.O referred to supra, reference is to Location, Ward, Division and T.S number (Column 2), but reference is obviously paimash number as is evident from correlation register. To further buttress writ petitioner's case, reliance is placed on extract from the relevant revenue register dated 21.03.2007 wherein paimash Nos.74 to 83B part is now 286/8 and it shows V.Kannappa Pillai as occupier. To be noted, V.Kannappa Pillai is aforesaid Somu Ammal's spouse. Therefore, crux and gravamen of the entire lis now narrowed down to correlation of paimash number and re-survey number qua said land.
