4.The private respondents herein alleged that the petitioner's society has committed breach of the terms and conditions. Since his complaint was not acted upon, he filed W.P.(MD)No.4220 of 2008 before this Court. This Court vide order dated 30.04.2008 directed the Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (WRO), Mel Cauvery Basin Division, Salem-7, to take action on the said representation. Pursuant to the said direction, the second respondent herein passed the order dated 01.07.2008, cancelling the permission earlier granted. TANGEDCO authorities also vide communication dated 16.07.2008 effected disconnection of the electricity supply. Challenging the same, Thiru.Ponnusamy filed W.P.(MD)No.6319 of 2008. Vide order dated 20.09.2020, the order passed by the authorities were set aside and the writ petition was allowed. The ground on which, the writ petition was allowed was that even without affording an opportunity to the writ petitioner, the impugned order came to be passed. The matter was remitted to the file of the second respondent to pass orders afresh in accordance with law. Thereafter, the impugned order came to be passed once again cancelling the permission earlier granted. It is this, that is put to challenge in this writ petition.
