Ramasamy Ambalam.Pr v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the refusal of privileges in a temple. Due to missing proper respondents regarding rival claims, the court acceded to counsel's request to withdraw the petition while preserving rights to file afresh.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition subject to preserving rights to file a fresh petition with proper parties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.19836 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.19836 of 2021
1.PR.Ramasamy Ambalam
2.S.Ramalingam Ambalam
- 3.R.Govindan Ambalam
- 4.A.Meyyappan Ambalam
5.RM.Sivanandham Ambalam
... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Uthamar Gandhi Road,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to withdraw the writ petition to array proper parties for a fresh claim.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PR Ramasamy Ambalam
- petitioner
S Ramalingam Ambalam
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court