A writ petition under Article 226 praying for cancellation of a patta and restoration of the petitioner's name in land records was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court as the petitioner failed to produce required documents.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.03.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2020
S.Subramanian
...Petitioner
Vs
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation/appeal petition submitted by the petitioner to cancel the patta No.1953 granted in favour of the petitioner father and restore the patta No.1989 in the name of the petitioner in respect of the land in S.No.130B/2A, and 131B/2A3 in Osanuthoor Village, Kulsekaranallur Post, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District respectively, dated 22.10.2020 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran.
For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh,
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
When this matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has not produced the required documents and he also produced a copy of the proceedings of the Revenue Tahsildar, Ottapidaram in Na.Ka.Aa2/1911/2020, dated 11.02.2021.
2.In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to keep the writ petition pending and therefore, the writ petition stands https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2020
dismissed. However, it is always open to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned with all supporting materials in regard to his grievances. No costs.
Sd/-
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
To
+1 CC to M/s.T.CHANDRA SEKARAN, Advocate ( SR-8334[F] dated 03/03/2021 )
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-8690[F] dated 04/03/2021 )
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2020 02.03.2021
SSS(CO) KB(12.03.2021) 2P 6C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Subramanian
The District Revenue Officer, Tuticorin District,Tuticorin
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin
The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorind District
V.PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
