The Hon'ble Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus as withdrawn by the petitioner. The petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh application by impleading private respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.[MD]No.19349 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.[MD]No.19349 of 2021 and W.M.P.[MD]No.16999 of 2021
Asaraf ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 009. 3.The Superintendent of Wakf, Office of the Superintendent of Wakf, No.159/3, Therpasayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram – 623 504. 4.The Inspector of Wakf, Office of the Superintendent of Wakf, No.159/3, Therpasayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram – 623 504. ... Respondents
P RAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the above said respondents to conduct election for the Mathagupatti Pallivasal (by name Abubakkar Siddiq Rali) Jamath situated at Mathagupatti, Sivagangai District based on the representation sent by the petitioner dated 07.10.2021, within a time frame limit.
For Petitioner : Ms.V.Ariyanatchi for Mr.R.Babu Jaganath For Respondents : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha Standing Counsel
1/2
W.P.[MD]No.19349 of 2021
O R D E R
Mr.R.Babu Jeganath, learned Counsel on record for the sole writ petitioner, adverting to the earlier proceedings dated 11.11.2021, submits that he has got instructions from the writ petitioner and seeks leave / permission of this Court to withdraw the captioned writ petition, but makes a fervent plea to take out a new writ petition after arraying all necessary / proper parties.
2. Learned Counsel on record for the writ petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file to the following effect:
“This writ petition is withdrawn with a request for liberty to file fresh writ application by impleading private respondents.”
[Extracted as such]
3. Captioned main writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, albeit preserving the rights of the writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. Captioned Writ Miscellaneous Petition (impleading petition) is disposed of as closed as the same has now become unnecessary. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. To be noted, impleading petitions are normally not taken on file in the admission board without leave of the Court. The Registry shall bear this in mind in the days to come.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (W)
// True Copy //
/ /2021
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
MR
NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
COPY TO:
1.The Registrar (Judicial),
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2.The Sub Assistant Registrar,
Writ A.E Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.
ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD]No.19349 of 2021 15.11.2021
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GC(01.12.2021) 2P 3C
2/2
Asaraf
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
