N.Mathiyalagan v. The District Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking a mandatory order for the issuance of tender applications to the petitioner was closed as infructuous and without costs due to lack of representation and adversarial submissions.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted. Writ petition closed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.17704 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :07.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
W.P(MD)No.17704 of 2019
and W.M.P(MD)Nos.14203 and 14204 of 2019
N.Mathiyalagan ... Petitioner Vs. The District Manager, TASMAC, 5/b1 Shipcot Industrial Campus, Muthuvudayanpatty Post, Pudukottai District. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue tender application to the petitioner, for shop Nos.6535, 6764 at Alangudi and Shop No.6756 at Patchikoottai and Shop No.6658 at Pulonviduthi in Pudukkottai District by virtue of tender notification issued by the respondent on 26.07.2019 in Na.Ka.No.A2/2191/2019 and Ve.Aa.No.51/Se.Ma.Tho.A/Pudukkottai/2019 dated 26.07.2019 based on the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2019.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.H.Arumugam,
Standing Counsel
ORDER
There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Mathiyalagan
- respondent
The District Manager, TASMAC
Coram
J.Nisha Banu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court