The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the recognition of an election observiror. The Court disposed of the petition as infructuous because the cause of action no longer existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06-10-2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP (MD) No.17500 of 2015
And
MP (MD) Nos.1 to 3 of 2015
S.Kandasamy
..Petitioner
vs.
1.The Chairman cum Managing Director,
BSNL Corporate Office,
Bharath Sanchar Bhavan,
Harish Chandra Mathu Lane,
Janpath,
New Delhi – 110 001.
2.Assistant General Manager (SCT),
BSNL Corporate Office,
R No.221, 2nd Floor,
Eastern Court,
Janpath,
New Delhi – 110 001.
3.Chief Liaison Officer (SCT),
BSNL Corporate Office,
R No.221, 2nd Floor,
Eastern Court,
Janpath,
New Delhi – 110 001.
4.The Registrar of Societies,
Government of NCT of Delhi,
Delhi.
5.P.N.Perumal6.N.D.Ram
7.R.Raveendran
Respondents
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of
the second respondent in connection with the impugned order of
recognition granted in Order No.65-3/2015-SCT/ dated 27.08.2015
and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent
to nominate Observer for conducting free and fair election of the
Office Bearers of CHQ based on the petitioner's representation
dated 02.09.2015 till then the second and fourth respondents have
to be restrained from recognising the election conducted on
30.09.2014 held at Solapur.
For Petitioner: No Appearance
For Respondents-1 to 4: Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar
For Respondents-5 and 6: Mr.R.S.Anandan
ORDER
The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents 1
to 4, made a submission that the cause aroused for the purpose of
filing the present writ petition did not exist as of now. Thus,
no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the
grounds raised in the present writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as
infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Svn
To
1.The Chairman cum Managing Director, BSNL Corporate Office, Bharath Sanchar Bhavan, Harish Chandra Mathu Lane, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001.2.Assistant General Manager (SCT), BSNL Corporate Office, R No.221, 2nd Floor, Eastern Court, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001.3.Chief Liaison Officer (SCT), BSNL Corporate Office, R No.221, 2nd Floor, Eastern Court, Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001.4.The Registrar of Societies, Government of NCT of Delhi, Delhi.WP (MD) 17500 of 2015
PMK(CO)
SB(26/10/2021)
S.Kandasamy
The Chairman cum Managing Director, BSNL Corporate Office
Assistant General Manager (SCT), BSNL Corporate Office
Chief Liaison Officer (SCT), BSNL Corporate Office
The Registrar of Societies, Government of NCT of Delhi
P.N.Perumal
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court