Allowed

Apple @ Malayandi.C v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC22 Mar 2021WP(MD)/1688/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench directed the Deputy Superintendent of Police to dispose of a representation lodged by C.Apple @ Malayandi regarding his name in a police history sheet, considering specific High Court guidelines within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Deputy Superintendent of Police to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding the history sheet within two weeks.

Apple @ Malayandi.C Vs the Superintendent of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

WP(MD)No.1688 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.03.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA WP(MD)No.1688 of 2021

¶5

C.Apple @ Malayandi ... Petitioner

¶6

vs.

¶7

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶8

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District.

¶9

3.The Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet No.107 of 2012, which is being maintained by the third respondent's Police station by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2021.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Oli Raj For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandra Sekar, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the second respondent to remove his name from the History Sheet No.107 of 2012. The main grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 20.01.2021 has not been considered till date.

¶14

2.Mr.S.Chandra Sekar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor who accepts notice for the respondents, on instructions, would contend that the representation submitted by the petitioner is pending for consideration.

¶15

3.In the circumstances, the Deputy Superintendant of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District is directed to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner based on findings and on merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order, keeping in mind the guidelines issued in the decisions in Sabari @ Sabarigiri Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Annanagar (L&O) Range, Madurai City, Madurai and Others reported in 2018 4 MLJ (Crl) 585 and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Thirumagan Vs. The Superintendant of Police, Madurai District

¶16

1/2

¶17

WP(MD)No.1688 of 2021

¶18

reported in 2020 (2) LW (Crl) – 266.

¶19

4.With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶20

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶22

¶23

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Thoothukudi District. +1 CC to M/s.A.OLI RAJA, Advocate ( SR-13031[F] dated 23/03/2021 ) WP(MD)No.1688 of 2021 22.03.2021 SRK(CO) KB(16.04.2021) 2P 5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

Apple @ Malayandi.C v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Apple @ Malayandi.C v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durai.Chandrasekaran. Vs The Asst.Sub-Inspector

P.Ramesh Vs The Commissioner of Police

Vijaykumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Al.Karuppaiah Vs The Superintendent of Police

Pon.Murugesan Vs The Commissioner of Police

M.Gopalakrishnan Vs The Superintendent of Police