K.Murugan v. the Manaing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.1675 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
W.P.(MD)Nos.1675 & 1676 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.1791,1792,1793 & 1794 of 2018
K.Murugan :Petitioner in W.P(MD) No.1675 of 2018 A.Thavasi :Petitioner in W.P(MD) No.1676 of 2018 Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) CMDA Complex, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Anna Nagar, Madurai 625 020. 3. The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC),Madurai North District Manalur, Sivagangai Dist. :Respondent in WP(MD)1675/18 4.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Madurai South, Sipcot, Kappaloor, Madurai District. :Respondent in WP(MD)No.1676/18
COMMON PRAYER: Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notification of the 3rd respondent in V.Va.Aa.No.325/SemaTho/17 dated 03.11.2017 published in Malaimalar newspaper dated 04.11.2017 and the impugned notification issued by the 3 rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.579/2017/B dated 10.01.2018 published in Makkal Kural Tamil Daily newspaper dated 11.01.2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to extend the licence to the petitioner for selling eatables and for collecting empty bottles in the Bar attached to TASMAC retail vending shop of respondents bearing Nos.5151,5160 Madurai, in accordance with law.
1/4
W.P.(MD)Nos.1675 of 2018
For Petiti oner : Mr.C.Jegannathan For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam (in both WPs)
The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in both Writ Petitions would submit that the matter has become infructuous.
Assistant Registrar (CS-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
vrn
Note:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) CMDA Complex, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Anna Nagar, Madurai 625 020.
3)The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC),Madurai North District, Manalur, Sivagangai Dist.
2/4
W.P.(MD)Nos.1675 of 2018
20.04.2021
4.The District Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Madurai South Sipcot, Kappaloor, District.
+1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-16798[F] dated 21/04/2021 )
+1 CC to M/s.VEERA ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-16841[F] dated 21/04/2021 )
W.P.(MD)Nos.1675 & 1676 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.1791,1792,1793 & 1794 of 2018
CN(04.05.2021) 3P 7C
3/4
K.Murugan
A.Thavasi
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, Madurai North
The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, Madurai South
NISHA BANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court