11 .However, the fact remains that, according to the petitioner, after 07.05.2021 letter, whereby, the petitioner had made a request for 30 days time, no further notice whatsoever, as claimed by the respondent, had been served on the petitioner, therefore, the alleged 18.06.2021 personal hearing notice fixing the personal hearing, dated 28.06.2021, since has not been served on the petitioner, that cannot be taken as an opportunity, finally sought for by the petitioner, given to the petitioner, and therefore, on that ground itself, the impugned orders are vitiated, he contended. Apart from this alleged violation of principle of natural justice, though several other grounds have been emerged on the merits of the issue, however, the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the limited scope of the writ petition, where, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court can go into only with the aspect of any violation of principle of natural justice or violation of statute or for want of jurisdiction alone, and all other aspects on merits of the issue, can only be decided by the appellate authority, for which the parties can be relegated to, the learned counsel has confined only with the ground of such alleged violation of principle of natural justice, by citing the said claim made by the respondent that a notice, dated 18.06.2021 has been served on the petitioner.
