Writ petition under Article 226 for mandamus to enforce prior administrative orders disposed of as closed and infructuous because the petitioner's representation was considered and the complaint addressed.
No order as to costs; petition disposed of as closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.[MD]No.15014 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.11.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.[MD]No.15014 of 2016
Arumuga Velar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,
Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Inspector,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,
Eral, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Chief Hereditary Trustee,
Arulmigu Patchaiperumal
Ayyanar Sastha Temple,
Ariyapuram, Srivaikundam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
P RAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action to enforce the order made in Na.Ka.No.843/2012/E2 dated 14.03.2012 and Na.Ka.No.953/2012/A2 dated 16.03.2012 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2016 in accordance with law within time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramachandran
for Mr.A.Robinson
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent No.4 : No appearance
O R D E R
Mr.R.Ramachandran, junior in the chambers of Counsel on record for writ petitioner is before me in the captioned matter. Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran, learned Additional Government Pleader is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P.[MD]No.15014 of 2016
before me on behalf of official respondents [Respondents 1 to 3].
2. This Court is informed by learned Counsel Mr.R.Ramachandran that the captioned writ petition has become infructuous as the writ petitioner's representation has been considered and the writ petitioner's complaint has since been addressed and therefore, the same can be disposed of as closed.
3. Recording the stated position of the writ petitioner, captioned Writ Petition is disposed of as closed having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Assistant Registrar (AS)
// True Copy //
MR
NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Inspector,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,
Eral, Thoothukudi District.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-36488[F] dated 30/11/2021 ) W.P.[MD]No.15014 of 2016 29.11.2021
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking enforcement of an administrative order is maintainable when the petitioner's complaint has already been addressed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arumuga Velar
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department
The Inspector, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department
The Chief Hereditary Trustee, Arulmigu Patchaiperumal Ayyanar Sastha Temple
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
