3. Heard Mr.J.Lawrance, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who would submit that, though the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent are brothers who are the joint owners and patta stands in the name of petitioner as well as the fourth respondent, insofar as the fourth respondent is concerned, he has not made any claim over the said property and in his portion, he has already cut down a number of trees and sold the same. Therefore, insofar as the portion of the petitioner is concerned, the teak wood trees which are 50 in number have to be cut down and transported, after getting permission from the Forest Officer. Therefore, he has sent a representation in this regard to the second respondent on 30.03.2021 and therefore, the representation of the petitioner be directed to be considered by the respondents, of course, after hearing both the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent and thereafter, an order can be passed, disposing of the said representation, within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Court and in that case, the petitioner would be satisfied, he contended.
