Disposed

Lakshmanan.C v. the District Collector

Madras HC12 Aug 2021WP(MD)/14164/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging an eviction order under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, the High Court directed the District Collector to dispose of the pending statutory appeal within four weeks and maintained status quo till then, without adjudicating the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to dispose of the appeal within four weeks; directed respondents to maintain status quo till then.

Lakshmanan.C Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14164 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.08.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR W.P(MD)No.14164 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)No.11115 of 2021

¶4

C.Lakshmanan ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Sivagangai.

¶7

2.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.

¶8

3.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned eviction order under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, dated 23.12.2020, issued by the third respondent and direct the first respondent to issue patta to the Oorkavalan Maedai temple belonging to Vadakudi Nattar situated in Survey No.256/7 of Pallanthur group Village, on the basis of Settlement Land Record (SLR).

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Government Advocate

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(Order of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J. )

¶13

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, dated 23.12.2020, issued by the third respondent and direct the first respondent to issue patta to the Oorkavalan Maedai temple, belonging to Vadakudi Nattar, situated in Survey No.256/7 of Pallanthur group Village, on the basis of Settlement Land Record (SLR).

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/3

¶16

W.P(MD)No.14164 of 2021

¶17

2.The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the third respondent under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Admittedly, the petitioner has got remedy by way of an appeal, under Section 10 of the Act, challenging the order passed under Section 6 of the Act.

¶18

3.Mr.P.Karthick, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the first respondent – District Collector, Sivagangai, on 19.01.2021, challenging the order passed by the third respondent. Further, the learned Counsel submitted that instead of going into the merits of the impugned order, it would suffice to direct the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 19.01.2021, within a time frame and till such time, the official respondents may be directed to maintain status quo .

¶19

4.Mr.B.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate, taking notice for the respondents, submitted that the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the appeal within a time frame.

¶20

5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer as sought for by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, we direct the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 19.01.2021, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondents are directed to maintain status quo .

¶21

6.With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

Note :

¶25

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/3

¶28

W.P(MD)No.14164 of 2021

¶29

¶30

1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Sivagangai.

¶31

2.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.

¶32

3.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.Special Government Pleader ( SR-26233[F] dated 13/08/2021 )

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.P.KARTHICK, Advocate ( SR-26271[F] dated 13/08/2021 )

¶35

W.P(MD)No.14164 of 2021 12.08.2021

¶36

RS (23.08.2021) 3P 6C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

3/3

Lakshmanan.C v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmanan.C v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Subramaniyan Vs the Commissioner

M/S.Bhargava Knits Vs the Authorized Officer

Amaravathi Vs The District Collector

Ksm Educational Trust Vs the Presiding Officer