Disposed

Gangadaran.R v. the Block Educational Officer

Madras HC5 Aug 2021WP(MD)/13423/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of Mandamus directing educational authorities to consider petitioner's representation for Headmaster appointment and dispose within three months after providing opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider petitioner's representation for Headmaster appointment and pass reasoned order within 3 months after providing reasonable opportunity.

Gangadaran.R Vs the Block Educational Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.13423 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.08.2021 CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD) No.13423 of 2021

¶4

R.Gangadaran Teacher, S/o.late Ramamoorthi, Sri Sowdambiga Middle School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

1.The Block Educational Officer Bodinayakanur.

¶7

2.The District Educational Officer, Theni.

¶8

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni. ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the representation, dated 09.06.2021 and based on the representation consider the renewal proceedings while renewal the recognition of “Sri Sowdambiga Middle School”, Bodinayakanur, without due process of law.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Velavadhas For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Standing Counsel for State

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner seeks consideration of his representation dated 09.06.2021 for appointment as the Headmaster of Shri Sowdambiga Middle School at Bodinayakkanoor. The petitioner relies upon a memorandum of understanding dated 03.05.2018 in terms of which the petitioner is entitled to be in control of the aforesaid school for a term of three years.

¶13

2.The learned counsel states that in spite of submitting a representation on 09.06.2021, no response has been received till date.

¶14

3.Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned counsel for the State, accepts notice on behalf of all the three respondents. He states that the proposal has been forwarded and is currently with the second respondent herein.

¶15

4.Accordingly, without going into the merits of the matter, W.P.(MD).No.13423 of 2021 is disposed of by directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.06.2021 and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

W.P.(MD).No.13423 of 2021

¶18

dispose of the same by a reasoned order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner herein. Such reasoned order shall be passed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There will be no order as to costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (AE)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

¶24

1.The Block Educational Officer Bodinayakanur. 2.The District Educational Officer, Theni. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader (SR25530)

¶25

W.P.(MD).No.13423 of 2021 05.08.2021

¶26

¶27

RS (12.08.2021) 2P-5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

2/2

Gangadaran.R v. the Block Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gangadaran.R v. the Block Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palraj.v Vs the Chief Secretary

Ramalingam.M Vs the District Collector

Ramesh Kannan.M Vs the District Collector

C. Sam Devadasan, Vs S. Jeyakumar

Seenivas Thangadurai.v Vs The Commissioner

Anthonysamy Vs The Revenue divisional Officer/Maintenance Tribunal