Disposed

Ajitha v. the District Collector

Madras HC28 Sept 2021WP(MD)/13421/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition for demolishing alleged illegal construction was disposed without going into merits. Court formulated procedure directing petitioner to file a detailed representation with the third respondent, the Block Development Officer, to conduct an inquiry and decide.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file detailed representation with the third respondent to conduct inquiry; respondent to communicate reasoned decision within three months.

Ajitha Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD) No.13421 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.09.2021 CORAM :

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P(MD) No.13421 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD)No.14373 of 2021

Ajitha

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil. 2.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat Campus of District Collector Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Pudukkadai Post, Kanyakumari District. 4.The President / Executive Officer, Painkulam Village Panchayat, Painkulam Post, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Secretary, Painkulam Village Panchayat, Painkulam Post, Kanyakumari District. 6.Thanishlas 7.Ashokan 8.Sujin ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to demolish and remove the illegal and unauthorized construction of building suited in the name and style of Barathiyar Ilaignar Narpani Mandram and laid down of two iron bar abutting between the petitioner's property bearing Resurvey No.139/5C of Painkulam Village, Killiyoor Taluk, Kanyakumari District and road which leads to Viralivilai within a stipulated period fixed by this Court.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

1/3

¶11

W.P(MD) No.13421 of 2021

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For RR 1 to 4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader For R – 5 : No appearance For RR 6 to 8 : Mr.V.H.S.Prathap

¶13

ORDER

¶14

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶15

The petitioner complains of the private respondents having indulged in illegal construction without obtaining any permission from the appropriate authorities.

¶16

2.It is submitted by the sixth respondent that there is a private dispute between the petitioner and some of the private respondents which has resulted in the present mischievous petition to be filed.

¶17

3.Without going into the merits of the allegations, it is necessary to ascertain whether any illegal construction has been made.

¶18

4.Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader appears for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and submits that the third respondent may be the appropriate officer to look into the matter.

¶19

5.Accordingly, W.P(MD)No.13421 of 2021 is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to carry a fresh, detailed representation pertaining to the matters complain of to the third respondent-Block Development Officer. Upon receipt of such representation, the Block Development Officer will conduct an inquiry upon notice to the petitioner, the private respondents and others who may be affected thereby. If the Block Development Officer finds any illegal construction, the Block Development Officer will ensure that immediate appropriate steps are taken to demolish the same, upon due notice to the persons in occupation of such illegally constructed space.

¶20

6.The Block Development Officer should communicate a reasoned decision after completing his inquiry to both the petitioner and the private respondents within three months of the receipt of the representation.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

2/3

¶23

W.P(MD) No.13421 of 2021

¶24

7.Consequently, W.M.P(MD)No.14373 of 2021 is closed. There will be no order as to costs.

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

PS/SSL

¶27

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned .

¶28

To:

¶29

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

¶30

2.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat Campus of District Collector Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶31

3.The Block Development Officer, Munchirai Panchayat Union, Pudukkadai Post, Kanyakumari District.

¶32

4.The President / Executive Officer, Painkulam Village Panchayat, Painkulam Post, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Secretary, Painkulam Village Panchayat, Painkulam Post, Kanyakumari District.

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.S.SIVA KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-30525[F] dated 28/09/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-30660[F] dated 29/09/2021 ) W.P.(MD) No.13421 of 2021 28.09.2021

¶34

NSN(CO)/RS (08.10.2021) 3P 8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

3/3

Ajitha v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajitha v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Vs the Principal Secretary to Govt

Marriammal Vs the District Collector

Malaichamy.v Vs the District Collector

Marutee Agro Foods Vs the Authorisied Officer

S.Shanmugam Vs the District Collector

N.Manikandan, Vs the District Collector