Partly allowed

Nagarathinam v. the District Collector

Madras HC8 Apr 2021WP(MD)/1282/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the Village Administration Officer to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.10.2020 for changing the name in Adangal and related patta records within six weeks, noting the respondents had previously ignored the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits within six weeks.

Nagarathinam Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1282 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.04.2021 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P(MD)No.1282 of 2021

Nagarathinam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Tanjavur District.

¶8

2.The Tahsildar, Pattukottai Taluk, Tanjavur District.

¶9

3.The Village Administration Officer, Nattusalai Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Tanjavur District.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to consider the representation dated 12.10.2020 for change of name in Adangal and other records pertaining to the Patta No.1772 to the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran

¶13

For Respondents : Mrs.M.Rajeswari

¶14

Government Advocate

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 12.10.2020 wherein the petitioner is seeking for change of name in the Adangal.

¶17

The case of the petitioner is that the subject property originally belonged to the grandmother of the petitioner and the Adangal records also stood in her name. This property was settled in favour of the petitioner by virtue of registered settlement deed dated 31.03.2011. The further case of the petitioner is that the patta was also granted in favour of the petitioner.

¶18

The petitioner made a representation to the respondents seeking for change in the name in the Adangal records since it stood in the name of the grandmother of the petitioner. This representation was not acted upon by the respondents and left with no other alternative, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

W.P(MD)No.1282 of 2021

¶22

Heard Mr.K.Rajasekaran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs.M.Rajeswari, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.

¶23

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in the writ petition, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 12.10.2020 and pass orders on its own merits and strictly in accordance with law within a period of six(6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

The petitioner shall make a fresh representation to the third respondent along with all the relevant documents and also a copy of this order.

¶25

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No Costs.

¶26

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2021

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶30

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

1.The District Collector, Tanjavur District.

¶33

2.The Tahsildar, Pattukottai Taluk, Tanjavur District.

¶34

3.The Village Administration Officer, Nattusalai Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Tanjavur District.

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.K.RAJASEKARAN, Advocate ( SR-15731[F] dated 09/04/2021 )

¶36

W.P(MD)No.1282 of 2021 08.04.2021

¶37

RK (29.04.2021) 2P 5C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/2

Nagarathinam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagarathinam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Elavarasu.R Vs the Dist Collector

Senthilmurugan.R Vs the Thasildar

Ayyappan.M Vs the District Collector

Murugan. K Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Murugesan Vs the District Collector

M.v.L.Mohan @ Manikandan, Vs the District Revenue Officer