Allowed

M/S.Madura Coats Private Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Madras HC25 Jan 2021WP(MD)/12671/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order affecting the petitioner's dedicated feeder status. The court quashed the impugned order and allowed the petition by relying on the outcome of an identical earlier petition.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 15.09.2012 was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed; connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

M/S.Madura Coats Private Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

1 W.P.(MD)NO.12671 OF 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.01.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12671of 2012 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 & 1 of 2014

¶5

M/s.Madura Coats Private Limited, HT.SC No.36 Rep. by its Manager-Excise & Legal M.Ramasubramanian, Registered Office at 144, M.G.Road,

Bangalore – 560 001.

... Petitioner

Vs.

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

¶10

Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO),

¶11

Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶12

The Chief Engineer(Distribution), Office of the Chief Engineer(Distribution), Madurai,

¶13

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

¶14

Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO).

¶15

The Superintending Engineer,

¶16

Madurai Electricity Distribution Circle/Metro

¶17

Tamil Nadu Genertion and Distribution

¶18

Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO), Madurai – 625 007.

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the third respondent culminating in his impugned Lr.No.SE/MEDC/METRO/MDU/AEE/AE (G1)/F.HT SC 36/D.No.1419/12 dated 15.09.2012, quash the same and direct the respondents to continue the dedicated feeder status accorded to the petitioner for their HT SC No.36 which is being by fed the 33 KV Mill feeder of 110/33-11KV Arasaradi SS.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.N.L.Rajah,

¶22

Senior Counsel, for Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan.

¶23

For Respondents : Mrs.M.Parameswari,

¶24

for Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha.

¶25

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

1/5

¶28

2 W.P.(MD)NO.12671 OF 2012

¶29

O R D E R

¶30

Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents/TANGEDCO.

¶31

The learned Standing counsel seeks time since they want to engage the Additional Advocate General in this case.

¶32

I am unable to accept the said request for the simple reason that the case on hand is on the same footing and predicated on the same factual matrix on which W.P.(MD)No.7239 of 2013 was filed.

¶33

The learned Senior counsel pointed out that the said writ petition was allowed on 06.11.2020. A copy of the order was made available for my perusal. It is seen that the cases are identical.

¶34

For the reasons based on which W.P.(MD)No.7239 of 2013 was allowed, I quash the order impugned in this writ petition. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶35

// True Copy //

¶36

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶37

Pmu

¶38

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶39

To:

¶40

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶41

The Chief Engineer(Distribution), Office of the Chief Engineer(Distribution), Madurai, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO).

¶42

2/5

¶43

3 W.P.(MD)NO.12671 OF 2012

¶44

The Superintending Engineer,

¶45

Madurai Electricity Distribution Circle/Metro Tamil Nadu Genertion and Distribution Corporation Limited(TANGEDCO),

¶46

Madurai – 625 007.

¶47

+1 CC to Mr.ARUN ANBU MANI, Advocate ( SR-2499[F] dated 29/01/2021 )

¶48

W.P.(MD)No.12671 of 2012 25.01.2021

¶49

VB (03.02.2021) 3P 5C

¶50

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶51

3/5

M/S.Madura Coats Private Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Madura Coats Private Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Generation and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer Vs the Joint Commissioner

Sathishkumar.P Vs the Commissioner

Thangavel.a Vs the Commissioner

M. Paulchamy, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

The Capuchin Friars Minor Vs the Chairman

M/S.Sathya Bala Auto Power Vs the Assistant Commissioner