Dismissed

Anthony Nicholasbalan.S v. the Commissioner of Fisheries

Madras HC12 Aug 2021WP(MD)/12326/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking writs for fishing permission withdrew three Writ Petitions and associated miscellaneous petitions. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, closing related miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw petitions; Writ Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

Anthony Nicholasbalan.S Vs the Commissioner of Fisheries — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.12326 to 12328 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.08.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

W.P(MD)Nos.12326 to 12328 of 2021 and

¶6

W.M.P(MD).Nos.10699, 10717, 10713 and 9676 to 9684 of 2021

¶7

S.Anthony Nicholasbalan ...	Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No 12326 of 2021
S.Anthony Rajabalan ...	Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No. 12327 of 2021
Tmt A. Violet Mary ...	Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No. 12328 of 2021
versus
1.The Commissioner of Fisheries, Office of Commissioner of Fisheries, Fisheries Welfare Department, Chennai 600 035.
2.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fish Harbour Management Wing, Thoothukudi.
4.Thoothukudi Speedboat Common Panchayat Association, Rep by its President, Mr.Xaviervas, Thoothukudi Harbour,
Thoothukudi. ..	. Respondents in all cases

¶8

Common Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the first respondent in his proceedings in RC.No.26174/J5/2020 dated 12.07.2021 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to permit the petitioner's trawler boats for fishing at Tharuvaikulam Fish Landing Centre.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

1/2

¶11

W.P(MD)Nos.12326 to 12328 of 2021

¶12

(in all cases) For Petitioners : Mr.C.Jeganathan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.Veerakathiravan Senior Counsel asst. by Mr.P.Subbaraj Counsel for State

¶13

COMMON ORDER

¶14

The petitioners seek permission to withdraw these three Writ Petitions and have circulated a letter dated 06.08.2021 in this connection. Such permission is granted and W.P(MD)Nos.12326 to 12328 of 2021 are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, W.M.P(MD). Nos.10699, 10717, 10713 and 9676 to 9684 of 2021 are closed.

¶15

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶16

// True Copy //

¶17

tsg

¶18

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶19

¶20

1.The Commisioner of Fisheries, Office of Commissioner of Fisheries, Fisheries Welfare Department, Chennai 600 035.

¶21

2.The District Collector,

¶22

Office of the District Collector, Thoothukudi District.

¶23

3.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fish Harbour Management Wing, Thoothukudi.

¶24

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-26351[F] dated 16/08/2021 ) W.P(MD)Nos.12326 to 12328 of 2021 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.10699, 10717 10713 and 9676 to 9684 of 2021 12.08.2021

¶25

RD(25.08.2021) 2P 5C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/2

Anthony Nicholasbalan.S v. the Commissioner of Fisheries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anthony Nicholasbalan.S v. the Commissioner of Fisheries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ve.Annamalai @ Ramesh Vs the Secretary

Pichaiarockiyamary.S Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Amirthalingam Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Maheswari.M Vs the Manager

Indira.P Vs the District Collector

Mohan.S Vs the Superintending Engineer