Dismissed

Deepa Amutha v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC1 Jul 2021WP(MD)/10893/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge bench issued Writ of Mandamus directing Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of a pending land appeal (Na.Ka.A1/648/2016) alleging forged documents and patta issuance within eight weeks, after hearing counsel.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to dispose of appeal in Na.Ka.A1/648/2016 within eight weeks; petitioner to submit fresh representation.

Deepa Amutha Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.10893 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.07.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.(MD).No.10893 of 2021

Deepa Amutha

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi,

¶10

Virudhunagar District.

¶11

2.Kalirajan

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to speedy disposal of the petitioner's appeal in Na.Ka.A1/648/2016, dated 24.01.2020 with fixing in the time frame based on the petitioner's representation, dated 24.09.2019 and 24.01.2020.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.PR.Boomee Rajan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai for R1 Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal that is pending in Na.Ka.A1/648/2016, dated 24.01.2020, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶18

2.The case of the petitioner is that she had purchased the subject property from one Muniammal by virtue of a registered sale deed, dated 20.05.2015. The further case of the petitioner is that the second respondent had created forged documents and had registered the very same property. By virtue of this document, he had also sought for a patta and the Tahsildar, Sivakasi, without proper notification had issued patta in favour of the second respondent. The petitioner aggrieved by the same filed an appeal before the first respondent and the same was taken on file in Na.Ka.A1/648/2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first respondent has not enquired the appeal and therefore, left with no other option, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court, seeking for appropriate directions.

¶19

3.Heard Mr.PR.Boomee Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Government Advocate appearing for the 1 st respondent.

¶20

4.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for this in writ petition, there https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

W.P.(MD).No.10893 of 2021

¶23

shall be a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal in Na.Ka.A1/648/2016, dated 24.01.2020, after affording opportunity to the petitioner and the second respondent on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass final orders, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

5.The petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the first respondent along with all relevant documents and a copy of this order.

¶25

6.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶26

Assistant Registrar (AD II)

¶27

TM NOTE:

¶28

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶29

¶30

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-21047[F] dated 02/07/2021 )

¶32

W.P.(MD).No.10893 of 2021 01.07.2021

¶33

KK(09.07.2021) 2P 3C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Deepa Amutha v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepa Amutha v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jailani Beevi.K Vs the District Collector

Rahamathunnisha Beevi.M Vs the Managing Director

Murugesan.a Vs the District Collector

Palanivel Rajan.K.P.S Vs the Regional Manager

Jaffar Ali.a Vs The Superintending Engineer

Praveen.J Vs the Regional Manager