Petitioner challenged a demand notice. Court held petition infructuous as tax appeared paid under counsel submission, dismissing the writ.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to approach competent authority if other grievances exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
and W.M.P.No.8910 of 2016
S.Murugesan,
S/o.Subbiah .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Asst. Engineer,
Chennai Water Supply Board,
Division-09,
Workshop 108 (113 New),
Chennai.
2.The Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply
and Sewerage Board,
Through its Managing Director,
Chennai-2.
3.The Asst. Revenue Officer,
Revenue Department,
Division III, Chennai Corporation,
Chennai-600 034.
4.The Senior Accounts Officer,
Attached to the Office of the Managing Director,
The Chennai Metropolitan water Supply
and Sewerage Board,
No.1, Pumping Station Road,
Chintadripet, Chennai-600 002. .. Respondents
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent made in the impugned order dated 15.12.2015 (handed over to the Menial of the petitioner on 30.1.2016) made in Old CMC No.07/108/0622/0000002139/09/113/03329/000 issued by Senior Accounts Officer attached to 2nd respondent viz., the 4th respondent herein and to quash the same and to further direct not to give effect to the demand made in the impugned order till such time, the assessment order of the 3rd respondent in property tax, in terms of the order of this Court after considering the representation of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Loganathan For Respondents : No appearance ******
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that as per the impugned demand notice, tax has already been paid by the petitioner
and nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
2.In view of the above submission, this writ petition stands dismissed
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
17.04.2021
abr
To
1.The Asst. Engineer,
Chennai Water Supply Board,
Division-09,
Workshop 108 (113 New), Chennai.
Page 3 of 4
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
(abr)
S.M.Subramaniam, J.
W.P.No.9930 of 2016
17.04.2021
Page 4 of 4
S.Murugesan
Chennai Water Supply Board, Division-09
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board
Asst. Revenue Officer, Revenue Department
Senior Accounts Officer, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
