10. The Employee was issued with a charge memo, stating
inter alia that he had failed to verify the genuineness of the
specimen signature in the withdrawal slips before posting it in
the ledger, thereby caused a loss to the Bank. The Employee,
based on the complaint lodged by one Mohan, was detained by
Police from 17.04.1997 to 19.04.1997 and since the Employee was
under judicial custody from 20.04.1997 to 02.06.1997, he was
placed under suspension by the Bank by an order dated 24.04.1997.
It is seen that though the Bank gave an undertaking before this
Court in W.P.No.15230 of 1997 filed by the Employee for quashing
the enquiry proceedings that they will not proceed with the
enquiry proceedings, they acted contrary to their own
undertaking. Subsequently, the Employee went upto Supreme Court
and after disposal of SLP, he requested the Enquiry Officer to
provide him an opportunity to cross examine four witnesses, which
was refused, thereby there was a violation of principles of
natural justice. The Enquiry Officer, based on the documents
produced, came to the conclusion that the charges are proved,
pursuant to which, the Disciplinary Authority dismissed the
employee from service, which was confirmed by the Appellate
Authority.