Disposed

K.Nagarajan v. The Chief Secretary

Madras HC23 Jul 2021WP/9536/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the alleged allotment of Panchami lands classified as reserved for Scheduled Castes to non-Dalits. The Court directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's fresh representation after notice and dispose of it by a reasoned order within two months.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to submit a fresh representation to the District Collector within two weeks; the third respondent directed to consider and dispose of it with a hearing within two months.

K.Nagarajan Vs The Chief Secretary — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.07.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶7

W.P.No.9536 of 2021

¶8

K.Nagarajan .. Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1 The Chief Secretary Secretariat Office Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

2 The Commissioner Chennai City Corporation Rippon building Chennai-600 003.

¶12

3 The District Collector District Collector Office Singaravelar Maligai No.62 Rajaji Road Chennai-600001.

¶13

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office (South) Guindy, Chennai-600032.

¶14

5 The Tahsildar Tahsildar office Sozhinga Nallur Chennai-600 119.

¶15

6 The Secretary ST and SC Welfare Office Secretariat Office Chennai-600009.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

7	The District SC and ST Welfare Officer District Collector Office Singaravelar Maligai No.62 Rajaji Road Chennai-600001.
8	The Inspector General of Registrar Sathome High Road Santhome Chennai-600028.
9	The District Registrar District Registrar Office Guindy CIDCO Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
10	The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Nanganallur Chennai-600061.
11	The Executive Engineer CMWSSB, Perungudi Mandal-14 No.6/64, Ullagaram Chennai-600091.
12	The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO, Madippakkam Chennai-600091.
13	The Commissioner of Police Chennai City Corporation Vepery, Chennai-600007. .. Respondents
Pra Ind	yer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of ia for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd
res	pondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated
14.	10.2020 to take serious steps to retrieve the Panchami Lands
fro Che	m Non Dalit occupants at Chennai District, Corporation of nnai Perungudi Zone-14, Ward No.169 Survey No.69(1B), 70, 73
and and	76 according the 'A' register in the Village of Ullagaram it may be used for the Dalit communities according the rules
and the	regulations issued by the Tamil Nadu Government to protect Dalit rights and livelihood.

¶18

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Pushpalatha

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

For Respondents

¶21

: Ms.Karthika Ashok

¶22

Sr.Standing Counsel (Corpn) for 2nd respondent

¶23

: Mr.C.Harsha Raj Counsel for the State for respondent Nos.1, 3 to 10 and 13

¶24

ORDER

¶25

(Order of the Court was made by Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.)

¶26

The petitioner complains of the alleged allotment of Panchami - Cheri natham lands to non-Dalits.

¶27

The petitioner states that the lands in S.Nos.69(1B), 70, 73 and 76 in Ullagaram village are classified as Panchami or Cheri natham lands in the relevant revenue records. Consequently, it is stated that such lands are only to be allotted to persons belonging to scheduled castes. Instead, it is alleged that the said lands have been allotted to several persons, who do not belong to scheduled castes. In spite of issuing notices to the official respondents on 15.10.2020 to prevent them from registering such lands in the names of nonDalits, it is alleged that the official respondents have not taken any action on the petitioner's complaint.

¶28

Mr.Harsha Raj, learned counsel for the State, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1, 3 to 10 and 13. He states that the representation of the petitioner was not submitted to the third respondent - District Collector who is the appropriate authority to decide the representation. He further states that if a representation is submitted to the third respondent - District Collector, the same will be considered and disposed of in accordance with law.

¶29

Accordingly, without going into the merits of the matter, the petitioner is granted leave to submit a fresh representation to the third respondent - District Collector within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt thereof, the third respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation by a reasoned order after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others who would be affected by such decision. Such reasoned order shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

W.P.No.9536 of 2021 is disposed of on these terms. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.10132, 10138, 10139 and 10141 of 2021 are closed. There will be no order as to costs.

¶32

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶33

//True Copy//

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

bbr To: 1 The Chief Secretary Secretariat Office Chennai - 600 009. 2 The Commissioner Chennai City Corporation Rippon building Chennai-600 003. 3 The District Collector District Collector Office Singaravelar Maligai No.62 Rajaji Road Chennai-600001. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office (South) Guindy, Chennai-600032. 5 The Tahsildar Tahsildar office Sozhinga Nallur Chennai-600 119. 6 The Secretary ST and SC Welfare Office Secretariat Office Chennai-600009.

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

7	The District SC and ST Welfare Officer District Collector Office Singaravelar Maligai No.62 Rajaji Road Chennai-600001.
8	The Inspector General of Registrar Sathome High Road Santhome Chennai-600028.
9	The District Registrar District Registrar Office Guindy CIDCO Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
10	The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Nanganallur Chennai-600061.
11	The Executive Engineer CMWSSB, Perungudi Mandal-14 No.6/64, Ullagaram Chennai-600091.
12	The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO, Madippakkam Chennai-600091.
13	The Commissioner of Police Chennai City Corporation Vepery, Chennai-600007.
+1	cc to M/S.R.Pushpalatha, Advocate, S.R.No.35280
+1	cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.35307

¶38

W.P.No.9536 of 2021

¶39

CP(CO) SU(30/07/2021)

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Nagarajan v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Nagarajan v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venkatesh Vs The Principal Secretary

R.Jayanthi Vs The Authorised Officer

S.Ramesh Vs The Registrar General

Vijayakumar G Dhas Vs Dito

V.S.Mani Vs Member Secretary

Mayavi Vs The District Collector