the petitioners have submitted application under Section 28-A of the Act before the third respondent on 10.10.1996. Thus it is clear that within a period of 90 days from the date of the award passed in the said LAOP, the petitioners made their claim for re-determination of the value of the land for compensation on the strength of the Award passed in L.A.O.P.No.98 of 1994, dated 06.09.1996. However, the petitioners did not pursue the same and thereafter, they filed another representation claiming for redetermination of the value of the property under Section 28-A of the Act before the first respondent on 29.03.1997, which was received by the first respondent on 02.04.1997. However, this representation was not considered and subsequently, they made another representation, in which the order impugned in this Writ Petition was passed by the first respondent for the reason that the claim made by the petitioners, is barred by limitation. The third respondent, being the requisitioning body, only on their request, the subject lands were acquired for the purpose of developing the Maraimalai Nagar New Satellite Town. Therefore, the third respondent ought to have forwarded the same to the authority concerned for re-determination of compensation. Though the first and second respondents disputed the seal put up on the representation submitted by the petitioners', dated 10.10.1996, the third respondent have not denied the same. Therefore, the third respondent ought to have forwarded the same to the first respondent for re-determination of the value of the property.
